Art on the Brain

by A. Jay Adler on December 7, 2011
Read More: , , , ,

.

Welcome brainiac, hail mensch.

From Alva Noë, “Art and the Limits of Neuroscience“:

What we do know is that a healthy brain is necessary for normal mental life, and indeed, for any life at all. But of course much else is necessary for mental life. We need roughly normal bodies and a roughly normal environment. We also need the presence and availability of other people if we are to have anything like the sorts of lives that we know and value. So we really ought to say that it is the normally embodied, environmentally- and socially-situated human animal that thinks, feels, decides and is conscious. But once we say this, it would be simpler, and more accurate, to allow that it is people, not their brains, who think and feel and decide. It is people, not their brains, that make and enjoy art. You are not your brain, you are a living human being.

We need finally to break with the dogma that you are something inside of you — whether we think of this as the brain or an immaterial soul — and we need finally take seriously the possibility that the conscious mind is achieved by persons and other animals thanks to their dynamic exchange with the world around them (a dynamic exchange that no doubt depends on the brain, among other things). Importantly, to break with the Cartesian dogmas of contemporary neuroscience would not be to cave in and give up on a commitment to understanding ourselves as natural. It would be rather to rethink what a biologically adequate conception of our nature would be.

Enhanced by Zemanta

1 comment

{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

Maureen December 7, 2011 at 1:21 pm

Does this mean we’re not really the sum of our parts, certain of which we cannot do without?

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: