The other day I posted a TED video of Harvard’s Michael Sandel on “The Lost Art of Democratic Debate,” or argument. Today, we’ll look at some random (hmn) examples of what he might have been talking about.
Here is Sharron Angle, Tea Party challenger to Nevada’s, and Democratic Party Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid, from the Las Vegas Sun’s Nevada Wonk:
Republican Senate candidate Sharron Angle chalks up her shift — some say flip-flop — on Social Security to gathering more information.
Angle said today during the opening of her North Las Vegas headquarters that she never wanted to privatize Social Security. Instead, she said, she wants to “personalize” it.
But during a debate in May on the public affairs show “Face to Face With Jon Ralston,” Angle said, “We need to phase Medicare and Social Security out in favor of something privatized.”
Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has assailed his opponent for the comment. He opposes Social Security privatization.
President George W. Bush also tried to privatize a portion of the Social Security program in 2005. The move was defeated, and Republicans saw their popularity plummet.
I, myself, in creative contexts, have played with connotative distinctions between “private” and “personal,” the former suggesting a possible secretiveness, as in Merriam-Webster’s third definition, that is not connoted, properly, by the latter. But none of this is relevant to the debate over Social Security accounts, and, really, we don’t want politicians and the government playing semantic games with us, do we? Yet they do, all the time, don’t they? Even “reformist” Tea Party candidates, who the moment they run for office and wish to win decide they will treat “the people” like idiots – as we see above in the verbal shell game switch between words.
Then there is the the not entirely negligible matter of logic. The origins of Social Security, we know, are in the Great Depression. What we are just possibly managing to live through is the closest thing to it since. If you have an IRA or some kind of 503B or 547 retirement account, not to ignore any non-retirement investments, did you notice how their balances did not soar during the economic meltdown of 2008-09? Had it been privatized – oh, goodness, even if it had been personalized – that is what would have happened to your Social Security account. Some security. Not very social.
Related articles by Zemanta
- What? What? I thought Sharron Angle was imploding. (redstate.com)
- Reid Ad Attacks Angle’s Second Amendment Remedies Comment: ‘It’s Crazy’ (VIDEO) (huffingtonpost.com)
- Testing the limits of grabbing the third rail (washingtonmonthly.com)
- Dems will mark Social Security’s 75th with offensive against GOP (thehill.com)
- Hot Spots: Lockboxes and Audio Books (thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com)
- A Profile for the Mid-Terms: Sharron Angle, Candidate for the Nevada Senate (blogcritics.org)
- You: Reid’s GOP challenger tests ‘tea party’ appeal (latimes.com)
- Reid Holds Small Lead in Nevada (politicalwire.com)
- Michael Sandel: The lost art of democratic debate (sadredearth.com)
- Michael Sandel On “The Lost Art Of Democratic Debate” (camelswithhammers.com)
- Blown to bits: TED Michael Sandel: The lost art of democratic debate (fredzimny.wordpress.com)
- The lost art of democratic debate: Michael Sandel on TED.com (ted.com)
- Why Sharron Angle Still Has A Chance (outsidethebeltway.com)
- Will Tea Party Label Hurt in Midterm Elections? (abcnews.go.com)